Yes, it might! Insurance companies have long been known to charge more to insure male drivers under 25 years old, because of actuarial data that showed they were more likely to cause serious accidents. But for some reason, they've also charged women more than men later on, despite women's generally safer driving records. It would be great if gender bias were never a factor in calculating premiums.

These days, technology is finally shifting auto insurance away from gender-based pricing, to behavior-based assessment, which could end up saving safe drivers hundreds annually.

Real-time driving data collection through telematics, measures specific behaviors like braking habits and acceleration patterns, rather than starting from demographic assumptions.

Research shows women typically display safer driving patterns that are now being captured and rewarded through these telematics programs. Insurance companies offering these programs have offered up to 30% premium reductions for safe drivers, with women benefiting the most often. But as a man who practices similar safe driving habits, telematics assessment should be able to help you optimize what you can save on premiums as well, since insurers can see the concrete evidence of safer habits, regardless of gender.

The traditional gender-based pricing model persisted largely unchanged until recent decades when regulatory challenges and technological innovations began forcing reconsideration. Several states, including California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania, have now restricted or banned the use of gender in auto insurance pricing, recognizing the potential for discrimination. These regulatory shifts provided the initial push for insurers to develop more objective measurement tools like telematics.

The contradiction in traditional insurance pricing became apparent when examining accident statistics against premium costs. Women statistically have fewer DUI incidents, fewer fatal accidents, and less risky behaviors like speeding or driving without seatbelts. Despite these safer tendencies, women in their 40s and beyond often face higher premiums than their male counterparts with similar driving histories.

This pricing discrepancy stems partly from how insurers evaluate risk. While men are more likely to cause catastrophic accidents, women statistically file more small to medium-sized claims. Insurance companies have historically weighted these frequent smaller claims against women drivers, even though the total payout amounts are typically lower than for serious accidents predominantly caused by male

drivers. 

Beyond gender, traditional insurance models have relied heavily on factors like credit scores, zip codes, and marital status—all of which can disproportionately impact women. Women are more likely to experience credit score penalties following divorce or widowhood, face wage disparities that affect their credit history, or live in urban areas with higher base premium rates.

Modern telematics systems capture detailed information about how you handle your vehicle. The technology measures hard braking events (sudden stops), rapid acceleration patterns, and speeding incidents. These factors are particularly valuable in assessing risk because they directly correlate with accident likelihood—sharp accelerations and frequent hard braking often indicate aggressive driving habits that increase collision risk.

Mileage and timing data provide crucial context for risk assessment. Driving during high-risk periods (like late night hours) or accumulating significant highway miles can affect accident probability.

Advanced telematics applications can detect phone handling while driving, including texting, scrolling, and other distracting behaviors. This data point has become increasingly important as distracted driving emerges as a leading cause of accidents.

The contrast between telematics metrics and conventional rating factors is striking. Traditional models relied heavily on demographic correlations and historical claim patterns across broad groups, while telematics measures specific actions taken by individual drivers. This shift from correlation to causation creates a more accurate and fair pricing system.

The newer, behavior-based pricing model could eventually eliminate gender as a rating factor entirely.

​